Talcum Powder Litigation Update In a pivotal legal decision on March 31, 2025, a US bankruptcy judge decisively denied Johnson & Johnson’s ambitious $10 billion settlement plan aimed at resolving numerous lawsuits. These lawsuits claim that Johnson & Johnson's talc-based products, notably their iconic Baby Powder, are linked to causing ovarian cancer. This ruling represents a significant blow to the healthcare conglomerate's strategy to manage these allegations through bankruptcy protection. Key Reasons for the Settlement Rejection in Talcum Powder Litigation Judge Christopher Lopez, presiding over the case, identified several major flaws in Johnson & Johnson’s proposed settlement. A critical point of contention was the notable lack of support from the claimants—primarily women—who argued the talc products led to their ovarian cancer diagnoses. Additionally, the settlement sought to unjustifiably dismiss claims against related non-bankrupt entities including retailers and Johnson & Johnson’s newly formed spin-off company, Kenvue. Corporate Accountability and Consumer Protection This crucial ruling underscores significant issues regarding multinational corporations' approaches to consumer safety claims. Johnson & Johnson's strategy to use bankruptcy filings as a shield throws light on practices aimed at reducing litigation risks and controlling compensation expenses. The judge’s refusal stresses the necessity for corporations to confront legal challenges directly within traditional legal avenues, ensuring justice and fair compensation for affected consumers. Broader Implications for Corporate Ethics and Legal Tactics As Johnson & Johnson redirects its legal defenses back to conventional courts, this continuing saga will likely have a lasting impact on how companies handle consumer safety disputes legally. This case could redefine narratives around corporate responsibility and transparency, potentially reshaping public and stakeholder expectations of ethical business practices in various industries. What Consumers and Industry Observers Should Watch This development is crucial for consumers, analysts focused on corporate governance, and legal professionals. It provides a critical perspective on the management of such legal disputes and may lead to significant shifts in corporate behavior and accountability standards across industries. You may read the Talcum Powder Litigation Update from Reuters Here Follow Hiatt Law Group to stay informed about this significant legal development and its implications for consumer rights and corporate ethics. You may learn more about the cases we handle here .

On March 22, 2025, a Georgia jury delivered a groundbreaking verdict against Bayer, awarding $2.1 billion to a plaintiff who alleged their cancer was caused by exposure to Roundup®, Bayer’s widely used weed killer. The award breaks down into $65 million in compensatory damages — designed to cover the plaintiff’s direct losses — and an extraordinary $2 billion in punitive damages, signaling the jury’s strong disapproval of Bayer’s handling of the product's risks. Learn more about the dangers of glyphosate exposure from the EPA here . Bayer’s Planned Appeal for Rounup Lawsuit Bayer has announced it will appeal the Georgia decision, citing past successes in reducing large verdicts — in some cases slashing awards by up to 90%. However, this staggering verdict reflects a growing trend: juries are increasingly siding with plaintiffs who claim that glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup®, significantly increases cancer risk. Recent studies from the National Institutes of Health   have explored links between glyphosate exposure and serious illnesses, such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. What This Verdict Means for Roundup Lawsuit Victims This Georgia case is part of a much larger pattern. Thousands of individuals across the United States have filed lawsuits against Bayer, claiming Roundup exposure caused their cancers. The size of this latest verdict could influence future jury decisions and may pressure Bayer into broader settlement negotiations. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after using Roundup®, it is crucial to understand your legal rights. Courts are sending a strong message: companies must be held accountable  for exposing the public to harmful chemicals without adequate warnings. Learn more about Roundup® lawsuit claims and how Hiatt Law Group can help. What Cancers Are Linked to Roundup®? According to the American Cancer Society, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is one of the most common cancers associated with glyphosate exposure. Other conditions potentially linked include: B-Cell Lymphoma Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Other glyphosate-related cancers Even if your exposure occurred years ago, you might still be eligible for a claim. Take Action Today Hiatt Law Group is actively pursuing claims for individuals affected by Roundup® exposure. Our experienced team is ready to stand by your side — offering compassionate support and aggressive legal representation. 📞 Call Hiatt Law Group at 662-636-6291  today for a FREE, no-obligation consultation . Or Schedule a Call with one of our dedicated intake specialists here . Let’s fight for the justice and compensation you deserve. You can learn more about the types of cases we handle, here.

If you or a loved one has been affected by asbestos exposure, navigating the path to compensation can be daunting. At Hiatt Law Group, we simplify this process with a clear, step-by-step approach designed to secure the settlement you deserve. From your initial free consultation to the final receipt of your compensation, our expert team is here to guide you through every stage with precision and care. Here are the six key steps we follow to ensure you understand how to file an asbestos claim and ensure your case is handled effectively and efficiently: Step 1: Initial Free Consultation The first step in making an asbestos claim starts with a free consultation call with our intake team. During this call, be ready to discuss your work and medical history. This information helps us determine if you have a viable case that meets the criteria for an asbestos trust fund claim. Step 2: Legal Review Once we have your initial details, our legal experts will examine your case to identify the asbestos-containing products you used or were exposed to with the companies being sued. This step is crucial in establishing a connection between your exposure and the responsible company. Step 3: Medical Records and Tests For non-malignant cases: Approved cases move to the next level – ordering your medical records. Trusts require a pulmonary function test and a chest x-ray, both reviewed by a medical professional. If you haven't done these tests, it’s essential to arrange them with your healthcare provider as soon as possible. Alternatively, if we see a significant demand (50+ people), Hiatt Law Group can organize a community event screening in your area. If we cannot access your medical records, the case will be put on hold until they are obtained. For cancer cases: This step involves obtaining essential documents such as the pathology report from your cancer diagnosis and chest x-ray slides, which must be reviewed by an expert pulmonologist. This process can be time-consuming, potentially taking up to 90 days, as we wait for your medical provider to fulfill the request. To expedite your case, you can help by directly obtaining the pathology report and x-ray slides from your healthcare provider. Having these documents ready can significantly speed up the process toward filing. If these medical records cannot be accessed, your case will unfortunately be put on hold until they are obtained. Step 4: Expert Report & Filing the Claim Upon collecting all necessary medical documentation and confirming eligibility, we send your medical and exposure information to our asbestos medical expert to prepare a report that identifies your asbestos exposure as a cause of your diagnosis/injury. Once we receive this report, our staff files your case against the bankruptcy trusts set up for each of the companies we identified in step 2.  Typically, we file a client's case against 10 to 25 different companies. Step 5: Trust Review Once your case is filed with each bankruptcy trust, each trust will review your case to see if it meets the legal criteria for a settlement offer. Bankruptcy trusts review claims in "FIFO" queue (first in, first out) and the waiting time to have your case reviewed varies by bankruptcy trust; some take a few months and others can take over a year. Our team will keep you updated on all developments and will assist in providing any additional documentation required. Step 6: Liquidation and Payment Once your case is approved by a bankruptcy trust, we are sent a Settlement Offer for your case. Settlement Offer values are based on your injury and are set by the bankruptcy court - they are non-negotiable. We will mail this Settlement Offer to you to sign, and then submit the signed Settlement Offer to the Bankruptcy Trust to accept your offer. The bankruptcy trust will review and accept the signed Settlement Offer and then put your case in line for payment. Bankruptcy trust payments are made monthly, so typically our clients receive their funds within 60 days of signing the Settlement Offer.  Once we receive your payment, we send you notice of the payment along with a breakdown of the fees and any expenses and then mail your check to you as soon as is possible.  Why Choose Hiatt Law Group Choosing Hiatt Law Group for your asbestos exposure claim ensures that you are partnering with a team that genuinely cares. With our deep experience in successfully managing claims with asbestos bankruptcy trusts, we are dedicated to securing the justice and compensation our clients rightfully deserve. Our team approaches each case with focused expertise, empathy, and sensitivity, understanding the delicate nature of these moments in your life. Trust Hiatt Law Group to guide you through each step of the process with commitment and personal attention, ensuring the best possible outcomes during this challenging time. Let us help you move forward. 662-636-6291.